>>>>What did you replace SBT with?????
>>>
>>>We went to Visual AccountMate; the code provided was cleaner, but we're not happy with VAM, either - they do not provide the source to their class libraries when you buy source code from their dealer. We also were less than pleased with our dealer's VFP experience and understanding, but given the audience, that wasn't surprising.
>>
>>AccountMate would have a very satisfied customer if they'd tell you up front that source for the classes wasn't included in the price of source code, or if they provided it on request.
>>
>>They do in the slick glossies. That's why I didn't look to them and am stuck in "Sad But True."
>>
>>Their reason is that programmers aren't CPA's and we might change something that is now no longer auditable. And you know how Audit Trail happy CPA's are.
>>
>
>Sorry, but I have trouble accepting that they won't allow me to add code to a GotFocus method to set SelStart and SelLength so a mouseclick behaves the same way as tabbing into it. And believe me, you can screw their code to hell and back from the forms with a little creative application of NODEFAULT! As soon as you can get any source code, preauditing is down the tubes...
>
>And if they're such compelte sticklers for auditability, why let you import edata AT ALL???

I didn't say that they were right, just that was their opinion. It sounded weak when they told me 2 years ago. I think it was at a booth at DevCon? but I'm not sure if there or in a call afterwards.

__Stephen