>And, now for the official definition *bg*:
>wrapper n. any object or set of objects that provides an object-oriented interface to nonobject-oriented software.

Does anyone else think this is limiting to wrappers? Why couldn't procedural code "wrap" other procedural code? Or a PRG wrap an object, or an object wrap and object. Maybe the definition should be about "wrapper classes" or "wrapper objects". Or are wrappers only: Objects around Non-Objects?