>I have made short reply to Ed Rauh, because his one was actually oversimplification. I would expect to speak, if necessary, with Ed about this, not with you. Anyway, if you have to drop some insight to a thread, you may feel free to address the person who asked a question. George, as I understand, says that FPW app is mostly, to the extent of developer's skills, compliant, and I expressed, though briefly, the same idea.
>Whatever, you see on UT, you still have no grounds to bold some words underscoring your doubts about anyone's credentials.
>Anyway, there is certain circle of people here, who are very aware about your and mine skills, reputation, personality etc.

Ed,

You're doing it again.

There was not one personal word in any of John's messages but every one of yours is getting personal.

First of all, I don't give a rat's a** who your friends are. Your friends don't make your points valid. Second, anyone can bold anything they want in their messages. I do find it interesting that you seem to interpret that saying "... you have oversimplified the problem" is a personal attack. This not personal, it is a challenge to your technical statements and if you can't reply with some valid technical arguments supporting you statements, then, in my opinion, those statements are worthless.

I find it iteresting that you are being quite free with the claims that John has some problem with the folks here in the thread but you are the one doing the atacking here. I also find it interesting that in 4 threads today alone I have seen John challenge your statements and I have yet to see you give any technical support for your statements. I have seen you call John names and tell him that no body likes him. The last time I dealt with that kind of discussion was in gramar school.