OK, OK.....Screw the sysop designation, an honest opinion is always sought.

>And more to the point, what was the point of Ed's post.... Just trying to keep things real. I post someting like that, I get bashed. Sounds like a double standard to me. What is the point of your post? What is the point of JK's post. I don't care if JK is a sysop or not. I will express my opinion to him or anybody else.
>
>The whole issue should just be dropped. Or at least, there should be some equal and fair treatment.
>
>BTW, as far as technical content goes, I think I pretty much nailed it in the post I was requested to make. Ed P. invited my in. Ed R. predicted what would happen. And in usual fashion, I put my money where my mouth is......
>
>Done...
>
>
>>More to the point, JVP, where is the technical content of your last post? Just what were you trying to accomplish with it?
>>
>>Bear in mind JK *is* a sysop here now, it's arguably his responsibility to try to keep things civil.
>>
>>>Where is the flame John????? Seems like a double-set of standards if you ask me. Clearly, Ed is baiting me, or trying to bait me into something. I am not going to flame him. Although, he did invite me, and has Ed Rauh predicted, I came up with something that is a bit more efficient...<bg>. However, I did not rub Ed's nose in it....did I???
>>>
>>>I suggest you mind you own business JK......... If you don't want flames, don't lob them my way....
>>>
>>>>Jeez, John, layoff! Ed does a lot of good here, as you do. Can we stop the flames? Christ!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Interesting....
>>>>>
>>>>>You post messages indicating that you are this picked-on person, and you post stuff like this????????????
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Ok, Pablo. If Mr. Petersen will jump into this thread, take it easy.