Control is binding by it's very nature. Unity is not binding, but is complete. Be at peace. Still the mind. Become the TextBox, and you will know The Way.

>No...I am contemplating the way of Visual FoxPro. Is it not right to question, for example, the binding of a Textbox? Does the Textbox desire a binding? Is binding the control limiting it's independent way? Or is it a Receptive entity and accepts that binding in it's natural transitions.
>
>One must seek unity with all aspects of the language to achieve harmony of purpose. This is the way of the I-Ching, my friend.
>
>>ROFLMAO! Gonz, I think you've flipped out. Looking at old code too much perhaps.