>>Okay, shall do. All this stuff ran fine in 9x, now I feel like I'm in Kindergarten with NTWS...I suspect doubling the RAM would help a lot, though, the NT machine really seems to be struggling with 64.
>
>We run with both 64 and 128. 64 has never been a big, just less "snappy".
>
>Virtual memory should be physical memory + 11.

That's a good starting point at least; there are lots of things that can alter the optimal size, such as extensive use of memory-mapped files, large clipboards, or having lots of things that sit and sleep, and while inactive, can safely be swapped out to disk. I tend to run a good deal larger than that, with swap file segments on each physical drive to help balance the I/O load.