>John,
>
>I believe that you have provided a technically incorrect response.
>
>I trust that you will correct it.
>
>Just calling them as *I* see em.
>
>Jim N

Jim,

In what way is John's suggestion techincally incorrect? It appears to me also that the reference being used in teh global application object is out of scope and no longer points to the form. How is John's answer incorrect? What is your revision of his answer to correct it? Or are you just throwing darts to see what happens?