>>IMO there are NO victimless crimes. The offender always damages their own conscience in the process, regardless of whether or not someone else was involved.
>
>Really? How about the laws against "detestable acts against nature" that are on the books in states like Rhode Island (unless they've finally gotten their act together....)
Garrett,
What the heck is a "detestible act against nature"? Peeing in the woods? *g* Seriously is it something like dumping gunk in a stream?
Best,
DD
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.
