Or the law in Missouri that states [paraphrase] 'you cannot take a bath/shower without a mule being present" ? I can't even REMEMBER the last time I took a shower with a mule being there .... not that there's anything wrong with that. <g>

The criminal act is only as offensive as the law governing the act is relevant.


>>IMO there are NO victimless crimes. The offender always damages their own conscience in the process, regardless of whether or not someone else was involved.
>
>Really? How about the laws against "detestable acts against nature" that are on the books in states like Rhode Island (unless they've finally gotten their act together....)