Maybe what? Are you acknowledging there is a dual-standard here?

That is my point John, with regard to attacking topics, point, as opposed to attacking people personally. I think I do what you do.. Sure my langauge may be a bit forceful, but it is the same nonetheless...


>Maybe....but I wasn't attacking anyone, just the topic. Who knows?
>
>
>>>>but isn't this a pretty lame topic?
>>
>>I have to believe that if I said this, I would be labeled as a personal attacker...
>>
>>Personally, I don't think it is a personal attack. However, I would bet dimes to donuts that if I said it, more than a few folks would crawl out the woodwork and lay it on me...yet again..
>>
>>If you get the same grief I do, then I will know that folks are consistient and not hypcritical. If you don't, then I know that I have less latitude than others..
>>
>>I don't really care. I do however think it is important to call attention the double-standard that clearly exists here....
>>
>>>Pardon my interruption and I don't know if this has been said already, but isn't this a pretty lame topic? One is hard-pressed to find articles about the future of any language beyond the next version because MS is not going to give competitors something to compete against:
>>>
>>>I can see it now, MS announced that eventually VB will host 10 widgets so Inprise starts working on Delphi2001 that will support 20 widgets.
>>>
>>>The best thing one can do is point to reviews of VFP from the last release, point to what has been said about the new release and leave it at that.