>>>
>>>All views are buffered by their very nature. The only difference is between table and row buffered. With row buffering, any changes are commited every time the record pointer moves (silly, if you ask me). With Table buffering, changes are only written when you issue a TABLEUPDATE().
>>
>>Thanks for the clarification, Erik!
>>
>>Any take on rather table or record buffering would be faster when bandwidth is low?
>
>Definitely Table buffering. Changes are only written when you specify, instead of every time the record pointer moves.

That was my first guess too, then I started confusing myself by thinking that since bandwidth would be a bottle neck, maybe if the changes were written as the processing occured, the modem would have a chance to "catchup" instead of being forced to do it all at the end.

Some day, when I am rich and famous, I'll set up a test.

Thanks for your time, Erik, as usual, I appreciate it a lot!