>>Correct me if I am wrong, transactions has been around since fox2.x and at that time no such thing as buffering feature. If there is, then there could be a different implementation in VFP.
>
>Transactions were totally new to VFP 3.0.
Do you want to say that if buffering=1, then transactions are prohibited? Should VFP raise some error in this case?
Edward Pikman
Independent Consultant