Hi, Jim, jess, Edward-

I was under the same assumption that transactions weren't valid for unbuffered tables, but in fact you can use transactions with unbuffered tables.

Of course all the processing has to occur within the transaction, and so it makes no sense to me to use them. But, it is valid. Weird.

>>>>Correct me if I am wrong, transactions has been around since fox2.x and at that time no such thing as buffering feature. If there is, then there could be a different implementation in VFP.
>>>
>>>Transactions were totally new to VFP 3.0.
>>
>>Do you want to say that if buffering=1, then transactions are prohibited? Should VFP raise some error in this case?
>
>If I recall the docs correctly, yes that is what I am saying. Of course looking just now I could not find any reference that asys that, it does say that the atbles must be in a database though.