>>AFAIK, !DELETED is not Rushmore optimizable.
>indeed it isn't
>index on DELETED() is optimized though (if i
>remember right)
>
>Arnon
You're right, I believe ! or NOT kills the Rushmore optimization. I'll try the last example and get back to you.
** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Gregory Cummines
Visual FoxPro 3.0/5.0
C/C++ Applications
** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
