>>So where do we stand now? How does this involve my wish? I want more Relational behavour in the product, but to me you're saying, you cannot have it because Fox will never be relational. It does not make sense to me.
>
>My objection to your wish is the implementation you are proposing, that being that VFP provide the data by using its xBase syntax under the hood. I would rather see VFP improve in its support of the standard relational language, that being SQL. I would love to see a full implementaiton of SQL in VFP including the entire ANSI 92 standard.

What about the implementation of the 8 relational operators with the same properties as I did describe in the first message ?

What about getting a SQL-select implementation which basicly offers a updatable filtered result, even with joins, so we can use the advantages I mentioned in the first message ?

I'm not that bound to the implementation, if my request can be forfilled within another way, I'd be more than happy.

Walter,