>Clearly you didn't read the entire thread or don't understand much of the relational model to see that this wish is trying to implement a features that has been done wrong in SQL.

I have since read the entire thread, and my opinion hasn;t changed. You have said nothing to demonstrate that the SQL implementation of the relational model is wrong, only quoted somebody else who says the same thing (in conflict with the father of RDs).

If SQL is wrong, then this is a problem with the ENTIRE relational database world, because SQL is what they all use (as far as I know). I doubt that the VFP team is going to take it upon themselves to buck this problem.

>In fact VFP actually FP got famous because of pure power. I just want to extend pure speed and power.

Hey, we all want this. It just looks like we all have different ideas of how VFP should get there.