>And what about the RECALL ALL vs optimistic table buffering and TABLEREVERT()? That's where I expected to see a significant difference in performance.
Er, I never got that far in testing, since the DELETE method was already known to be slower in total at that point than the NOT IN method...
RECALL was *very* slow though, in the one time I applied it to recover the DELETEDs from the above testing...
The Anonymous Bureaucrat,
and frankly, quite content not to be
a member of either major US political party.
