>I'll let it go. The're is no-one seriously interested in what i'm trying to >reach.

No kidding.. It is a shame it took you so long to get the message...

>Though I might propose more support for the relational language operators.

At some point, you will finally understand that MS is not interested in developing the VFP data engine anymore. In case you did'nt know, MS has been pouring a lot of resources in other areas with regard to data...

>Further discussion is useless, since your clearly not trying to think in this >issue nor want to see the benefits.

There are none... Otherwise, I would have agreed.

>If you've got a standpoint that even if it's wrong, you're not willing to >really look at the arguments of the other.

Sometimes, it's just a slam-dunk.....

>>In this i'm dissapointed john.

Whatever... I think I am in good company here.... You know, I am not the only one who disagreed with your premise...... Let's not forget that.....

>Well. i've should have known better......

Yes, you should have known better.....

What you attempted here is what I like to call an E.I.F

An Excercise in Futility

Merry Christmas....