>>So where do we stand now? How does this involve my wish? I want more Relational behavour in the product, but to me you're saying, you cannot have it because Fox will never be relational. It does not make sense to me.
>
>My objection to your wish is the implementation you are proposing, that being that VFP provide the data by using its xBase syntax under the hood. I would rather see VFP improve in its support of the standard relational language, that being SQL. I would love to see a full implementaiton of SQL in VFP including the entire ANSI 92 standard.

Sadly, i've to admit that this would a better choice, though it would be a hell of job since the SQL 2 standard is extremely wide and complex.

Regards,

Walter,