>Probably the best, actually, as we consider this a bit more (g).
>
>Can you spell "overthinking", boys and girls (laugh)?
>
>Thanks for the reality check, Bill...
>
>>Well, to not have an application object is not very OOP too ( or maybe not very Frameworkish ), :-) so why not, in light of that, just get it to work properly keeping the PRIVATE variable and press on? :-)
>>

Hey, you guys are "Flexible ...", right? :-)