>Thats fine well and good Jess..
>
>However, you still did not address my question regarding commandment number 6...

Well, this is just my own observation, but not to mention names here: Some MVPs, while protecting their status - should not always defend MS in a manner wherein things are obviously just in favor of MS.

>
>>John,
>>
>>This thread is for all of us. It's just that I am not an MVP, and I am not dreaming of to be. Having said that, I just speak on the same level as an ordinary visitor of the UT.
>>
>>Mr. Dodge said it better than what I can say. I strongly believe in his principles in the Electronic Media. Mr. Booth also did the same.
>>
>>>>6. If you are an MVP, don’t be biased because Bill Gates will not save your soul from hell.


>>>
>>>What does #6. mean...???
>>>
>>>>7. If you are an MVP, always remind yourself that you are there because of the technical ignorance of others.
>>>
>>>No... the MVP is an award for numerous and accurate - (although it can be debated how much accurate means anymore judging by some of the MVP's we have today) in online communities....
>>>
>>>Tell me Jess, even if the general perception of a post was rude, and the MVP gave some solid technical advice, would you NOT use the advice because of the rudeness???? Somewho, I don't think so.....
>>>
>>>Lets be clear here.... me being an MVP does not carry some special responsbility that I have to be civil all the time. This bull shit about "not befitting your MVP status" is nonesense. I think Walter Meester is one that is fond of that phrase. No, my responsibility is to be technically accurate, and to correct obvious technical inaccuracies I find. Folks on the whole, appeciate the fact that I and others do this....MVP's should be held to a higher technical standard... that is it....
>>>
>>>If anybody would care to debate me on this...please..... step up to the plate...