I will.


>I reckon that definately qualifies (-: (that's an antipodean emoticon)
>
>Are you going to submit it or do you want me to?
>
>Nice catch ...
>
>Cheers,
>
>Andrew
>
>>I'm sorry, I read your message too fast. You are definitely correct. I did some testing, and could not reproduce your problem until- get this: I turned Strictdate back on. In dev mode, I always operate with STRICTDATE set to 0, to make things easy on me. When I set it back to the default setting of 1, I got the error you described. Setting STRICTDATE to 0 during the index process and restoring it to 1 afterwards avoids the error, and produces the desired results.
>
>>
>>I think this definitely qualifies as a VFP bug. How about you?