>George,
>
>Nope that is not what it means, because;
>
>lnVar = 123
>lcVar = "lnVar"
>TYPE(lcVar) = "N" && The data type for lnVar
>TYPE("lcVar") = "C" && The data type for lcVar
>The string in lcVar is evaluated and the resultant data typoe is returned.
>
>This is logically the same as;
>
>lcVar = "123"
>TYPE(lcVar) = "N" && The data type for "123"
>TYPE("lcVar") = "C" && The data type for lcVar
>
>Think of it this way and see it clears up, type function says "What is the type of the thing in this expression?" The expression must be a character type and it is evaluated and the type of the thing in the character expression is returned.

Jim,

I see your point. Further, I think we're in agreement here on what's happening. However, my point wasn't whether or not this works, but whether or not the documentation coincides with that behavior. Clearly, it states that memory variables should be surrounded with quotation marks. Further, it goes on to say that if you don't "U" is returned. That fact that in your example above not doing so returns "N" contradicts the docs.

Personally, I think that this should be passed on to the documentation team. I would hope that you'd be in agreement.