>SDT creates and registers some SDT-specific extensions through DBCX; check with the people at Stonefield if you need details. Doug's done a great job with it, and I suspect that you simply aren't aware of what it can do.

No Ed, I know Doug is doing a very good job

>It's not just random garbage that tries to shoehorn stuff in the wrong way. DBCX is there because it's an extensible standard that fits neatly with other DBCX-compliant extensions; CodeBook-derived frameworks and products coexist nicely with SDT...

I know very well this Ed, I'm working on some DBCX2 utility since 4 months ago (but only in my free hours, that I have no much).

>Like I said, YMMV, but so far it's done everything I expected and more.

And also more can be done,