Time to jump into a contrversial thread < g >.
Here's the text from my FoxPro Links web page about UT:
This entry used to read "We've never had much success with it - we generally prefer the MS news groups, but other people swear by it. So your mileage may vary.", but more recently we've actually joined their premium mmbership program and found that the system works better that we thought.I always found UT next to useless before buying PUTM, but I guess that's what others have been talking about with the switch in the header file for Single/Multi-user.
Not sure which side of the fence this puts me on (my cheeks are hurting from the effort of hangin on < g >)
BTW, I want my message to appear in the archives
as it was posted, not with a more recent sig block attached. Therefore I don't have one and if I feel the need, I'll append one manually.
Cheers,
Andrew
>John,
>
>Steve's post, from maybe sometime last summer, really was true about how dysfunctional this place is for the basic user.
>
>>Here is a funny one.....
>>
>>If I am on the top of a thread, I can hit map, and see the thread map. However, if I click map from this message, I am told that feature is only for PUTM's...
>>
>>>Test Message to see if sig block appears...
If we were to introduce Visual FoxBase+, would we be able to work from the dotNet Prompt?
From Top 22 Developer Responses to defects in Software
2. "It’s not a bug, it’s a feature."
1. "I thought I fixed that."
All my FoxTalk and other articles are available on my
web site.
Unless specifically identified otherwise, anthing posted here is purely my opinion and may or may not reflect the policies or practices of Microsoft.