>Jim,
>
>>That would result in 1600 not being a leap year and it was as was 1200 adn will be in 2400.
>
>Unfortunately, I though 1600 was not a leap year, and 1200 certainly was not either. Leap years where invented after 1600 (by some pope i think). ;-)
>

Walter,

Interesting then VFP has a major bug in that ?MONTH({^1600/02/29}) returns 2 and MONTH({^1700/02/29}) returns an error of an invalid date.

Boy, this is really going to screw up all those Shakespeare tracking apps I have out there.