Fred,

>Our main problem is we would have thousands of sites to update, and unfortunately, lowest common denominator of H/W forces our hands as to what we can do. I would love to just specify reasonable minimum requirements, but that's not my decision. No reason everybody shouldn't be using PIII 800's or Athlon 750's, with 512MB, right? *LOL* (someday, sooner than we think, THAT will seem rediculously slow/small, won't it?)

yep, but seriously, thousands of sites is indeed getting more problematic. But for the hardware requirements. It runs fine on a 32 MB Windows 95 P 133 machine, though performance could be better of course.

Walter,