>>
>>I recommend the structure changed to cTableName, nKeyValue
>>
>
>Yeah, I was expecting this since I've seen that approach discussed here at length.
>
>But I'm not sure that would solve my problem. Maybe if I SKIP to the next record, that would do it. But then I can do that with the existing structure... Hmmm... I'll give that a try.
>
>Thanks for the feedback

It is more of design philosphy change, you won't have to change the table structure when you add/remove tables.