>>>
>>>I recommend the structure changed to cTableName, nKeyValue
>>>
>>
>>Yeah, I was expecting this since I've seen that approach discussed here at length.
>>
>>But I'm not sure that would solve my problem. Maybe if I SKIP to the next record, that would do it. But then I can do that with the existing structure... Hmmm... I'll give that a try.
>>
>>Thanks for the feedback
>
>It is more of design philosphy change, you won't have to change the table structure when you add/remove tables.

note my use of locally scoped variables