Walter,
>Doug,
>
>>I'm sure that's a large part of it. You and Ed P. seem to get stuck here and I'm sure the both of you don't intend things to end up the way they seem often to do.
>
>Hmmm. In the future I might rethink my post twice, and reply in such way that this won't happen again.
Well, we all goof up at times. That's why we shouldn't be so hard on each other. What's the old saying, "Our sins look horrible on others." *g*
>
>>I have no ill will towards you or he or anyone else for that matter - it's a personal spiritual kind of thing for me so it's very important not to allow corrosive thoughts. I detest them when I find them in myself.
>
>>While I have as much stubborn pride as anyone else (for which I am constantly embarrased) I really do not want to impose my thoughts on others - it simply soesn't work anyway. I
do wish to influence others though and make no secret of it.
>
>IMO, All I tried to do is to defend the things I think with some practival examples. Seems to have another effect than I suspected.
This is understood. Your ideas will stand on their own merit and all we need to do is state them. Sometimes people just have different opinions. No big deal.
>
>>Let's just take a deep breath and start all over, ok? *s*
>
>I've said to myself to start all over again at jan 1st. I seem to have screwed up real fast. I'll reconsider my position and will post less even if I think that they're flat wrong.....
*g*
Welcome to the club. I feel mose stupid today regarding FoxPro than at any other time in my professional career. Perhaps I'm figuring out that there's a lot more to this product than I thought....
>
>BTW I really appriciate this.
No problem. I learned from the master himself. Tom Rettig.
Best,
DD
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.