>Look at IndexSeek(), it will return .T. if the searched expression is found without moving the record pointer if the second parameter is .F.
>
>HTH

---

>According to the legacy code I'm redoing, there's not supposed to be duplicates. Which would make sense since the field is a serial number. But I just did a query and there's 103 of them with duplicates and they're not deleted, either.
>>
>>I don't know how to handle this. If I put in a check for duplicates, it's going to complain every time it tries to save one of those records. I suppose I could do like the old program does and only check when you first add a record. But that brings me back to the original problem of how to check for duplicates without moving the record pointer.

Thanks,

Michelle