Great comments by all.

I encourage you to bombard Tamar with email about the subjects that matter to you. Also, we should support Markus as best we can with his new Magazine

>>Gee, you like here stuff that much...< bg >. Seriously, I encourage you to submit your feedback to Tamar. I don't think they get a lot of critical feedback. The magazine is in seriously bad shape. I once timed how long it would take me to go from front to back and glean all of the worthwhile technical content. 15 minutes.. That is pretty bad. The technical content is marginal at best. Steve's column is about the only thing worthwhile in the magazine. Andy MacNeill's stuff on ActiveX controls is OK. After that, it is a total crap shoot as to what you are going to get. For the intermediate to advanced developer, it is devoid of meaningful content.
>>
>
>
>I share your sentiment re FPA. IMO, they could take a lesson on content from VBPJ and MIND: ease up on the obscure topics that 1 in 5 developers will ever use, and beef up on Windows programming issues, DNA, COM, XML, etc. I feel like a VBPJ reader could become a well-rounded programmer from reading VBPJ- an FPA reader is too isolated to VFP-only issues.