When I say "object oriented", I understand that it must have at least:
- inheritance
- polymorphism
- encapsulation

VB is missing one, so, it's not object oriented. It's only an object language.

I don't want to get into a long discussion, since this subject was discussed so many times here. You know what I meant.

I simply can't accept that inheritance is something that is not important or useless. Or, as I heard from VB guys:
inheritance is something bad! :(

I use inheritance a lot and it saves me a lot of time...

In this case, "almost all OO concepts" it's simply not enough for me.

Vlad

>How do you recocile that fact that almost all OO concepts can be employed in VB? If I interpret your comments correctly, it is the lack of inheritence in VB that is the turn off...right???
>
>>I will say that I must have very serious reasons to use a non-OO language instead of an OO language.
>>