Hi John,

>Seriously, I encourage you to submit your feedback to Tamar. I don't think they get a lot of critical feedback.

That's a good suggestion. And indeed most feedback I get on Advisor articles is either positive or are corrections/additions. I think people hesitate to say that an article is bad, rather they say nothing.

>The technical content is marginal at best. Steve's column is about the only thing worthwhile in the magazine. Andy MacNeill's stuff on ActiveX controls is OK. After that, it is a total crap shoot as to what you are going to get.

Since our column is not in this list, what do you think we should improve in "Advisor Answers"?

Second, if you compare FP Advisor with FoxTalk, of course FoxTalk has more technical coverage. FoxTalk was always targetted at the experienced or advanced developer. The target group for FoxPro Advisor is broader and includes beginners, as well. Therefore you often find articles in there that don't go that deep into the material as you would do in an article in FoxTalk.

Christof