>>I'm using it, but it is not intuitive. I hate the way you have to iterate through the collections. Shouldn't there be a count property for every collection?
>
>I agree, a count property might be nice, but why do you need a count property when you have FOR EACH?
That's easy, I'm lazy!
John Harvey
Shelbynet.com
"I'm addicted to placebos. I could quit, but it wouldn't matter." Stephen Wright 
