>>Although your code works, the following code is much clearer:
>
>Lol! Why be so cryptic when you can use a one liner:
>
>?eval(chr(106) + chr(117) + chr(115) + chr(116) + chr(115) + chr(116) + chr(101) + chr(109) + chr(40) + chr(34) + 'table.dbf' + chr(34) + chr(41))

Why hasn't Ed Rauh posted a WSH example using regular expressions?

P.S. Your example is a bit single use isn't it? How do you pass it another path?