>>I've thought about it long and hard, but regardless of what I think it's nothing more than a WAG. I don't think that anyone outside the Fox team knows for sure. The only thing I know is that they're hard at work at it.
>
>I heard they are going to include the DWIM()(Do What I Meant) function at long last.<g>

I hope not - it'd be a short jump from there to a KenX DWIW wizard, and we'd all be out of a job!