>> I think I would group them as Jess has, but you should also consider testing/QA people.
>
>Oh yes, but I'd go farther and say you absolutely need this position. Also, part of the position description of a testing/QA person is that he/she is not one of the programmers on the project, and that he/she personally or through a project manager has enforcement rights over developers. Good, even decent, testing is extremely time consuming and planning-intensive, but it always saves time in the end.
>
>Isabel

I agree.