>>>I believe it's optimized for *5* or less.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I think it's either Rod Paddock or Gary DeWitt that has done some testing that shows performance takes a severe nose dive at 15.
>
>Craig,
>
>The "Suggested Concurrent User Limit" is 5 according to one of the Backgrounders I read in the MSDN Library.

Right. I'm aware of that, but it looks like the practical limit is a bit higher. Wow! That's totally the opposite of most MS products.