Information générale
Catégorie:
Codage, syntaxe et commandes
>Bob,
>
>Perhaps if its that much of a problem, you could write some equivalent of a scope resolution operator that would DO IN and send the result back to your report.
>
>Randy
>
>>Hi Randy;
>>
>>I was under the mistaken assumption that SET PROCEDURE was at the bottom of the hierarchy (like set library). I will have to give it a try. Of course, I am using the Codebook framework which uses the Metadata table to set procs and libs so I will have to do some other gyrations but I should be able to get it to work. I'll let you know.
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>Bob
>>
>>>
>>>The order is:
>>>
>>>PROCs in the current module
>>>PROCs in SET PROCEDURE file
>>>PROCs in modules in the calling chain
>>>PROCs in SET LIBRARY
>>>External Files (APP, FXP, EXE, PRG)
>>>
>>>Randy
You know, I think it would be easier just to change the procedure name!
Bob
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement