>How does that sound different? We have hidden and protected properties....
It sounds like Jim is referring to data related objects only and nothing about UI. In my understanding, it will work the same with today's VFP OOP. To me, nothing bad news to VFP'ers because learning VB, if necessary, is no longer that difficult because we've been to OOP technology for 5 years. VFPers could take advantage of that IMO. Isn't it true that one of the reason why VFPers keeps on whining about MS pushing VB over VFP is on the issue of VB lacks full blown OOP support?
>
>>A statement in the "Language Innovations" document describing VB7 says: "
OOP solves these problems. It packages data, and the methods that act on that data, into a single unit called an object. An object's data can be hidden to prevent unauthorized modification...".
>>
>>First of all, this sounds different than VFP. Secondly, it makes it sound like OOP in VB will be limited to data-related things.
JESS S. BANAGA
Project Leader - SDD division
...shifting from VFP to C#.Net
CHARISMA simply means: "Be more concerned about making others feel good about themselves than you are in making them feel good about you."
