>>I was just wondering if any of you are planning on upgrading your workstation to Windows 2000. I haven't read that much about it. Nor, was I on a beta. However, I read an article in the newspaper today and it was said that up until recently, it contained up to 63000 bugs. I would then assume there is certainly some of them around in the release. Comments?
>
>I've been using W2K for the last 3 months at work. It is rock solid. I do a lot of crazy stuff like instancing an app via OLE, and sending keystrokes to it from VFP every four hours, then munge the data and move it up to SQL Server. It has not had a problem. Don't hesitate to go to W2K Pro for you workstation.

Thanks for the feedback