>Gee, and I thought I was the only one to think that this was the "ideal" resolution for a 19" monitor.
>

>>Michel, you forgot "none of the above" -- I use 1152x864.

So did I, but I bumped it up to 1600x1200, and can't stand the thought of going back down, even if it is a bit hard to read...

I don't really do consistent reading on the screen -- I'm always bouncing around between things, so having the text small doesn't matter as much.