>>Why not a year? It would just work better if they all weren't called "Windows". At least you can tell from the year just how far out of date you are.
>
>Computers don't have to be out of date, thats all MS wants you to think. If they made something that worked called Product 1.0, why would you need to buy anything else? At least as a casual user. The whole 95, 2000 thing sounds so cheesy to me.

Ah, but that's the American Way. It certainly has worked for the auto industry (using a year to promote that you're out of date, even though there is nothing "wrong" with your old car)


>>Really, just how old is Windows 3.1 now, anyways? < g >
>
>1.9

What units? It must be dog years...