>>
>>
>>I sware I was just wait'n for our end-of-month process to run during lunch. But BTW: I didn't you would consider a rinky-dink little question like that as being "technical". Now that I think about it, the question was mighty lame.
>
>It was more technical than 'What did you have for lunch', which is what the thread was about.
Are you saying that the original question should have been worded, "Technically, what did you have for lunch?":-)
George
Ubi caritas et amor, deus ibi est