>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I sware I was just wait'n for our end-of-month process to run during lunch. But BTW: I didn't you would consider a rinky-dink little question like that as being "technical". Now that I think about it, the question was mighty lame.
>>>
>>>It was more technical than 'What did you have for lunch', which is what the thread was about.
>>
>>Are you saying that the original question should have been worded, "Technically, what did you have for lunch?":-)
>
>No...then we'd have to break everything down into it's composite parts. I ate lunch that day at Taco Hell. I don't want to know what the composite parts really are.
Probably a very wise choice on your part< g >.
George
Ubi caritas et amor, deus ibi est