>>An analysis of the time distribution of a person's posts would be much more revealing about how "connected" the person is.
>
>And the next thing you know, every one that posts 100 limerics a day or starting 30 threads like: "My form doesn't work right, what gives?" get an award from the RoboMVP ;-)

Doesn't it mean "Most Valuable Poet"? I guess I assumed incorrectly :-)

Seriously, I would think that MVP decisions certainly *should* be based on something other than poetry or sheer volume of chatter (whether Chatter section or other sections). I suspect that upcoming changes in the program will include some ways to gauge accuracy of content as well.