>>You're right. I've just noticed quite a large number of *very short*, and quite often inaccurate posts recently, indicating the person giving the answer did not take time to accurately read and analyze the question. Some answers are almost totally unrelated to the question.
>
>Or too many posts about posts.

My point was related to the large number of posts recently, and that much of it comes from *very short* answers, posted in a flurry of fast activity, that sometimes miss the mark by quite a distance -- presumably because the poster isn't carefully thinking the problem through before churning out the answer.

On balance, this is still the best place I know for fast, quality support of the Fox.