Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
This is a surprise
Message
De
27/02/2000 22:45:20
 
 
À
27/02/2000 22:34:07
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
Divers
Thread ID:
00338270
Message ID:
00338274
Vues:
18
I don't think UNIONS are fully optimizable, Dave. That might explain it. Try both SQLs with SET OPTIMIZE OFF and see what the differences are.


>Address is a table with 400,000 records indexed on Addrnum
>Cons is a table of 120,000 contacts indexed on CCust
>Both have tags on DELETED()
>
>The query...
>
SELECT A.* FROM Address A, Cons C ;
>  WHERE C.CCust = "GREATLA2" ;
>  AND C.PAddrnum = A.Addrnum ;
>UNION SELECT A.* FROM Address A, Cons C ;
>  WHERE C.CCust = "GREATLA2" ;
>  AND C.Addrnum = A.Addrnum
>
>runs about 50 times faster than...
>
SELECT A.* FROM Address A, Cons C ;
>   WHERE C.CCust = "GREATLA2" ;
>   AND (C.Addrnum = A.Addrnum OR C.PAddrnum = A.Addrnum)
>
>Both queries show as fully optimized with SYS(3054,1), both return the same result set.
>Strange uh!
------------------------------------------------
John Koziol, ex-MVP, ex-MS, ex-FoxTeam. Just call me "X"
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" - Hunter Thompson (Gonzo) RIP 2/19/05
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform