>
>Yeah -- a wizard thats the way to go.
>
>Jim's solution then is just one step in the wizard -- thus can be written as a general rather than structure solution.
>
>Look -- I think this would be worth doing as a general product.
>
>So one last question. There is really nothing like this out there? If I'm reinventing a third party product, this is the time to mention it. If something like this already exists, I guarantee we can sell it to our existing customer base -- which includes some very large companies who would need many,many licenses. Writing a product like this is better than having to write multiple query specfic screens for each customer. But simply reselling an existing product would be better still.
>
>Note: Stonefield Query unfortunately does not qualify, because though it explains Booleran logic extremely well, it still requires users to use the AND OR terminology.
>
>What I'm looking for may be called a reporting tool, rather that a querying tool.
>
>I will also do some research and report back on a new thread if I find anything.
>
>I will simply say that for us to start writing this, and find half way through that it already exists would be a Very Bad Thing. Even worse to find out after we finish.

Look at QBFBuilder from www.classycomponents.com.